It's here! – Lists of Atheists 3.0 Menu Menu Close POLITYKA Account Account Close Account Close Search POLITICS Facebook Twitter Instagram iOS and Android Flash Cards Application

The whole of Poland was impatiently waiting for the arrival of the coronavirus. The whole apparatus of the state from Nowogrodzka was the most impatient: we got up from our knees, regained our sovereignty and are digging up the Spit, THEY have it and we don't? The whole country is tight and ready. Like in a memorable moment. But we won't talk about it.

Looking - it's finally here. The state is prepared for a solemn reception. As always, the most solemn, in advance, are our beloved bishops. The Polish archbishop repeats: “I wouldn't advise exaggerating, let's shake hands! There are no confirmed cases." So until confirmation, the virus jumps from hand to hand and everyone is happy: they are not exaggerating!

As we know, there are bad people in Poland: Poles of the worst kind, teamed up with known forces. They don't believe in the bishop and they exaggerate. They publish reports online, as they personally collide with organizational incompetence and incompetence of the health service. Doctors of the worst kind say the same thing: we're not prepared.

Minister of Health Łukasz Szumowski has just announced: "We have the first case of coronavirus. The procedures worked." It's good.

The minister is in the so-called wrong mistake. The archbishop neglected, although he had rehearsed the entire defense with the "rosary to the borders" action. Catholics stood on the borders and effectively blocked the miasma of evil from penetrating the homeland of the Mother of God and John Paul II with the prayer of the rosary.

Then why didn't they stop now and let the enemy cunningly get to the core of the civilization of love? Did the archbishop put them to sleep with his "let's not exaggerate" and this traditional compactness with readiness?

The Archbishop is traditionally flexible, though rigid on a daily basis: Holy Communion can be received "in the hand" instead of in the mouth. Isn't this a sudden change from Catholic to Protestant sacred procedure? A Protestant is of the worse kind, so he will take it in his hand and maybe put it in his pocket or spit it out and the police will be needed.

Let's ask the flexible archbishop: will the believer receive Holy Communion from the hand of the parish priest wrapped in a rubber glove and equipped with the outfit required to fight a biological threat? However, this is not enough, because the entire process of creation, storage, transport and delivery to the place of handing over the sanctity must rely on strict procedures applicable in the event of a bacteriological war. Who will issue a certificate of compliance with the procedures for securing the sanctity and safety of the catholic who is biting?

"If someone is afraid, they don't have to say goodbye with holy water" - Archbishop Polak continues to be flexible.

Will worshipers be provided with proper attire and sanitized prior to entering the church? Maybe the sacred obligation to participate in the holy mass can be forgiven and even ordered? By whom - bishops or sanepid? A Catholic released from the sanctity of the Mass may not return. Some kind of sainthood.

Reasonable questions can be multiplied. But that's not the point. In the confrontation of religious opinions with the reality of matter, religious phantasms are reduced to this reality. You can no longer receive communion "orally", you can no longer put your hands in "holy water", you can no longer shake hands testifying to "brotherly love" and you can do just about everything that a Catholic must do.

So what is this holiness that loses to the virus? "The mystical presence of Jesus", "the body of Christ", "holy water", the prayer of the rosary lose to the primitive product of evolution, which is the virus, and that damned Darwin, whom Christians mock and constantly exterminate. What is the sanctity of holy water at all, if holy water is a soup full of E. coli bacteria and many others, which Catholics are diligently helping themselves to when they fall ill? Is the sacred going hand in hand with bacteria, viruses, diseases and death, which is dealt with by communing with this sacred? Evolution knows the symbiosis of organisms, but for the sacred to require symbiosis with evolution?

And yet it was possible to prevent the virus from entering with a "rosary to the borders". No one would get sick, no one would suffer, there would be no need to put the entire apparatus of the state on its feet, which is so ready that it has holes. And millions, instead of going to a Catholic in need of 500, 600, 700 plus, are spent on what a rosary at the border would do for free. Why does the rosary not work? And what the hell works with these sanctities anyway?

Tanaka

Quotes from wp.pl.