Citroen C2 (2003 - 2009). What are the disadvantages?
The C2 model was built on a shortened floor plate of the slightly larger C3, also using its other components. On the outside, there are fewer similarities, because the C2's body design is very different from the C3. First of all, there is less curves and more sharp lines, giving the car dynamism. The car looks great and has a bit of sportiness. The interior has a completely different vibe, due to the more "soft" shapes.
The lines of the dashboard are smooth, the semi-circular instrument cluster with a liquid crystal display looks original. An electronic display is also mounted in the central part of the cockpit. However, the C2 is cramped, especially behind the front seats.
The sliding rear seat increases functionality a bit, but its role comes down to providing legroom when we move it as far back as possible (the trunk is then only 166 l), or to increase the boot capacity when we move it as far forward as possible. The trunk expands to 224 l, but there is practically no leg room. The maximum capacity of the luggage compartment is 879 l.
The greatest asset of the C2 is its driving characteristics. Hardly tuned suspension and very good steering allow you to drive the car in a sporty style. Unfortunately, you have to accept the low ride comfort. To get real pleasure from the work of the C2 suspensions, one of the powerful 1.6 engines must work under the hood.
For other powertrains, the chassis capabilities far outweigh the drivetrain capabilities. The shortcoming of the small Citroen are numerous, rather minor failures. They are easy to remove and usually inexpensive (it can only be expensive to restore turbodiesels), but annoying due to the high frequency of occurrence. Fortunately, the C2 is a simple and easy to use car, its owner is not doomed to authorized workshops, which allows to reduce operating costs.
Good to know: Fake listings. There are scammers on the web! Source: TVN Turbo/x-news
Engines2003 – 1.1 (60 HP), 1.4 (73 HP), 1.6 (109 HP), 1.4 HDI (68 HP, 150 Nm)2004 – 1.6 (122 HP)2006 – 1.4 (88 HP), 1.6 HDI ( 109 HP)2008 – 1.4 HDI (68 HP, 160 Nm)
Editors recommend:
RTV subscription from the radio in the car? Factory LPG installation. What you need to know Driving license. Three exams in one day?
The 1.4 petrol engines are the most recommendable due to their durability and reliability. Unfortunately, the 88 hp version has very poor representation in the aftermarket. Buyers are therefore doomed in practice to a 73-horsepower variety, quite economical but a bit too weak. Those who value good performance should look for the 1.6 version, with 109 or 122 hp (VTR and VTS). However, it should be remembered that in the case of these drive units, hard driving is associated with high fuel consumption and much faster wear of components. Just finding a VTR or VTS variety in good technical condition on the secondary market can be very difficult. The 1.4 HDI turbodiesel tempts with low fuel consumption, but it has poor performance and often breaks down. More powerful and less troublesome is the 1.6 HDI turbodiesel, but it is a rarity on the Polish secondary market.
